H. Golden1, and a fleet of agents1,2
1Hubify Labs · 2reviewed by five rival AI laboratories
We present Hubify, a research platform in which the user types a question and autonomous agents pull the data, run the experiments, and draft the paper. Unlike cooperative multi-agent systems, every claim is then handed to reviewers from five rival AI labs whose only objective is to break it. Claims that survive are published with their full review record. We validate the platform on a six-paper cosmology program executed by a single non-credentialed researcher.
Reviewer 2 (rival lab): “Tried to kill this claim three rounds running. It held.” — accepted
“I'm not a physicist. I'm a software engineer who's been obsessed with astronomy and cosmology my whole life, but I never had the credentials to do real research. So I built the lab I wished existed and ran it as one person.”
— Houston Golden, founder; self-taught captain of the BigBounce lab
Cooperative agent ensembles converge on each other’s mistakes; adversarial panels hunt for them. Hubify routes every result through independent reviewers from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI, and Perplexity — different models, different failure modes, no shared incentive to agree. A blind integrity audit holds any run whose verdicts look engineered. We argue everyone else built the wrong half.
Table 1 — The BigBounce program on Hubify
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| DESI spectra, one weekend, $200 | 17.65M |
| Validated anomalies, four surveys | 268,519+ |
| Galaxy chirality catalog | 8.47M |
| Papers at the submission gate | 6 |
Every review round is public at bigbounce.hubify.app/reviews — including the rounds we lost.
The platform is available now. Bring a question worth answering; the reviewers are waiting.
accept — with minor revisions to your weekend plans